but the number of infant

I just received this e-mail from some chap named Kyisztina at maxwelln@kjvmail.com:

Subject: get ur facts str8
Date: 05/03/2006 05:00
To: Noddis

Yo Noddis,

Here’s some pretty hard facts to deal with that the majority of women are
not satisfied with the size of there ‘s machinery, also their disappointed
by their show in the room. Is this soundinglike u. If so, stop by
{address of Kyisztina’s doubtless fascinating website here}.

everyone wants to change the world in some drastic way. But in the end,
they realize that there’s nothing . actually a good idea in the first
place. Sure, it lowered the population growth rate tremendously, but the
number of infant

Hope is was of some help
Kyisztina.

Well frankly, Kyisztina, no it wasn’t. What the hell was all that about? You really ought to proof-read your e-mails before you send them out. The punctuation stinks! And send them to the right person – who’s this Noddis character?

Honestly, some people just don’t try. I might have been interested in whatever it was he was talking about if it hadn’t been so shoddily presented.

1 Response to “but the number of infant”


  1. 1 Pig on Wheels

    See also this article in the Guardian on the poetry of spam. Kyisztina has some catching up to do.

Comments are currently closed.